ConCourt rekindles Ramaphosa cash-in-sofa saga

The National Assembly ‘rule is inconsistent with the Constitution, invalid and it is set aside,’ Judge Mandisa Maya said.

South Africa’s top court faulted parliament’s decision to quash a report that fuelled efforts to remove President Cyril Ramaphosa from office over his handling of a burglary at his game farm.

The National Assembly “rule is inconsistent with the Constitution, invalid and it is set aside,” Constitutional Court (ConCourt) Judge Mandisa Maya said in a judgment delivered in Johannesburg on Friday.

Full story at Money Web.

By S'thembile Cele and Ntando Thukwana